Dickie Scruggs being accused by a judge of engaging in tactical delays in litigation? Come on, judge, don't you know who you are talking about here? This is one of the most noted litigation entrepreneurs in all the land! Why, accusing him of tactical delays is like alleging that he would violate a judicial order to return documents by playing a game of keep-away with Jim Hood, or of making arrangements to pay material witnesses $150,000 a year for no-show jobs, witnesses who were supposed to be the keys to a federal grand jury, a state grand jury, a "whistleblower" lawsuit alleging massive insurer fraud and numerous Katrina bad faith cases. I mean, what will they say next, that Scruggs participated in a conspiracy to bribe a judge or some other crazy charge like
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 46 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog