Dickie Scruggs being accused by a judge of engaging in tactical delays in litigation? Come on, judge, don't you know who you are talking about here? This is one of the most noted litigation entrepreneurs in all the land! Why, accusing him of tactical delays is like alleging that he would violate a judicial order to return documents by playing a game of keep-away with Jim Hood, or of making arrangements to pay material witnesses $150,000 a year for no-show jobs, witnesses who were supposed to be the keys to a federal grand jury, a state grand jury, a "whistleblower" lawsuit alleging massive insurer fraud and numerous Katrina bad faith cases. I mean, what will they say next, that Scruggs participated in a conspiracy to bribe a judge or some other crazy charge like
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 237 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog