Some things I wanted to update you on in State Farm v. Hood. Remember what this case is -- State Farm sued Hood back in November in his capacity as Attorney General, seeking to enjoin his renewed criminal investigation into the insurer's claims adjusting activity. State Farm obtained an injunction, that continues to this day, barring Hood from his investigation on the basis of an agreement he signed in early 2007 not to prosecute the insurer as a result of its settlement of 640 Katrina cases brought by the Scruggs Katrina Group. State Farm also paid $5 million to Hood, which he wanted to cover legal fees and costs of his investigation. Now, I have heard from all sides on this question, and one very interesting point of view -- and these folks would not be in the category of reall
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 205 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 249 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 199 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog