These are the latest developments from the State Farm v. Hood hearing, on whether State Farm's injunction against Hood's criminal investigation should continue, as of 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time, 1:30 p.m. Central Time. Testimony this morning touched on: the scope of Hood's investigative subpoenas and post-agreement subpoenas; the Rigsby sisters' subsequent data dump in July and whether they could be considered agents of the Attorney General; issues relating to National Flood Insurance Katrina claims by homeowners; the famed "confidential informant" letter from Hood to Alice Martin, U.S. Attorney for Northern Alabama, where Hood told Martin that Dickie Scruggs shouldn't be prosecuted for alleged criminal contempt, as desired by federal Judge Acker, because S
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 46 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog