In reading one of Ted Frank's posts yesterday at Overlawyered, I was reminded that I have neglected to blog about a strange case from Washington, Woo v. Fireman's Fund. I have actually followed this case for a couple years -- Washington is right across the Columbia River from Portland and I practice a fair amount in the state -- and I know Washington coverage law well, so I'm overdue in writing about the case.This decision, where the Washington Supreme Court found an insurer had a duty to defend a dentist accused of improper conduct, is, I regret to say, a mess. I don't say that merely because the case involves a dentist, Dr. Woo, who taunted one of his employees, Tina Alberts, about her pet pig, Walter, with photos of skinned wild boars, saying that "There is how Walter will lo
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Maniloff's Top 10 coverage cases of 2007
posted 36 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 14 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog