March 17 remains the last day for plea bargains in USA v. Scruggs, and if the defense motions that will be heard at today's hearing don't succeed, I wonder if we'll start seeing some movement. Here are the pleadings filed yesterday:Here is the government's opposition to Sid Backstrom's and Zach Scruggs' motions for severance. This brief makes the point that statements in a November 13, 2007 recorded phone conversation between Balducci and Backstrom were taken out of context to make it sound like Backstrom had no clue about the Lackey bribe. Judge for yourself. Here is the Backstrom motion to sever, read paragraphs 18 and 19. And here is the full transcript of the call between Balducci and Backstrom, attached as an exhibit to the government response. Here is the government's respo
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 199 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog