March 17 remains the last day for plea bargains in USA v. Scruggs, and if the defense motions that will be heard at today's hearing don't succeed, I wonder if we'll start seeing some movement. Here are the pleadings filed yesterday:Here is the government's opposition to Sid Backstrom's and Zach Scruggs' motions for severance. This brief makes the point that statements in a November 13, 2007 recorded phone conversation between Balducci and Backstrom were taken out of context to make it sound like Backstrom had no clue about the Lackey bribe. Judge for yourself. Here is the Backstrom motion to sever, read paragraphs 18 and 19. And here is the full transcript of the call between Balducci and Backstrom, attached as an exhibit to the government response. Here is the government's respo
Related Headlines
- Safest Cities to Drive Inposted 77 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Average Policy Sizes Increasingposted 83 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Ideas For AIG Select-a-Term Life Insuranceposted 82 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Termination Options for Term Life Insuranceposted 79 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Single Fathers and Their Children's Health Careposted 68 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Term Life Insurance Coverage Maximumposted 66 weeks ago on Official QuickQuote Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge questions whether it is proper for Scruggs to be represented by former counsel for co-defendant Patterson, dposted 47 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog