UPDATE: This is somewhat more complicated than I have time to explain here at present, but who appealed from the Fifth Circuit decision were Xavier University and 68 plaintiffs who wanted to have a class action that was called Chehardy. Some other plaintiffs who had been consolidated in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case did not appeal -- the Vanderbrook proposed class action plaintiffs and maybe there are some more who I've forgotten about. The plaintiffs had asked the Fifth Circuit to allow the Louisiana state courts to rule on the fl;ood exclusion issues in the case, the Fifth Circuit refused and that stood up with the Supreme Court's denial of cert. Incidentally, one of the cases in the Louisiana court system is Sher v. Lafayette, where a division of the Louisiana Court of Appe
Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealedposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog