This is the question some have posed to me. I considered this possibility immediately after I heard of the e-mail about Jim Hood, which is discussed in this post from two days ago. I soon rejected this as a likely possibility for reasons I will state below, and I didn't think it worth bringing up until I received several messages from regular readers whom I would place in the category of canaries in the rumor coal mine -- they reliably hear of almost all the key rumors and are accurate reflections of the zeitgeist (I mean this in a complimentary way -- if they were nutjobs I would pay no attention to what they say).The indications are therefore that a considerable traffic exists in the belief that the e-mail was not an accident, but rather a sort of dead fish mailed to Hood (&q
Read...Related Headlines
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood: I will offer help if someone will do what I won't
posted 219 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Case over in State Farm v. Hood
posted 223 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Dickie Scruggs asks that criminal contempt charges be droppedposted 242 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 205 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
State Farm attorney mistakenly sends query about having Hood held in contempt to reporters, Hood's press spokesperposted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
More on the Jones v. Scruggs sanctions hearing
posted 214 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Second Update on State Farm v. Hood hearing: Hood speaks
posted 224 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog