The docket for the Louisiana Supreme Court says that oral arguments will be heard tomorrow in Landry v. Citizens Property Ins. Co., a case featuring a remarkable opinion from the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal -- remarkable in the sense it makes you want to remark that it makes no sense whatsoever. Of the many insurance coverage cases I have read in the last year, this one is certainly in the top two as far as sheer ability to cause frustration and pain to the reader. As I said in this prior post on the case when it came out, the dissent is somewhat more to the point but equally out to lunch. There is no need to repeat the rest of what I said before, my opinion hasn't changed. You can read about it in the prior post. Landry is about Louisiana's Valued Policy Law, and the
Related Headlines
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 14 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Update on oral arguments in Landry, Sher cases before Louisiana Supreme Court
posted 26 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A.M. Best podcast on Sher and Landry cases before Louisiana Supreme Court
posted 22 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog