It should be obvious that intentional acts are not covered under a professional liability (E&O) insurance policy, but it is rare that a court rules on this question. The intentional acts exclusion in an E&O policy will normally read something like this: ?based upon, arising out of directly or indirectly, or in any way involving intentional wrongdoing, fraud, dishonesty, criminal or malicious acts by the Insured In a recent case summarized by Wiley Rein (see here) a court ruled that...
Read...Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 246 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 237 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 249 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog