There was a large number of filings in the USA v. Scruggs case (Northern Mississippi edition) yesterday, but one thing from these documents stuck out like a sweet potatoes deliveryman in a judge's chambers. Check out this passage from one of the exhibits attached to a supplemental Scruggs brief on the validity of the wiretaps in the bribery case.[Balducci] further explained, prior to this March 2007 meeting [where the alleged conspirators allegedly hatched their alleged plot to allegedly bribe Judge Lackey] the [Scruggs Law Firm] was trying to settle some Katrina Insurance cases with the State Farm Insurance Company. SLF and SFIC were near a settlement, however, [Dickie Scruggs] learned that the Mississippi State Attorney Generals office had threatened to indict SFIC due to some imp
Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 67 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood discusses meeting with Balducci, Patterson
posted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Another Balducci bribe attempt?
posted 39 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Biden gives back Scruggs money: does this mean he will be the Veep nominee?
posted 15 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog