In my post from Monday, I neglected to mention that in addition to Landry v. Citizens Property, the Valued Policy Law case, the Louisiana Supreme Court was also to hear oral arguments Tuesday for Sher v. Lafayette, a case where the lower appellate court found a flood exclusion in a homeowners policy ambiguous. I don't know why I did, I've known Sher was coming up for oral argument for some time, but we all do dumb things. Except Dickie Scruggs, that is, as his famous, rich friends like to point out. Forgetting to mention the case in the last post also means I missed a chance to rip into the decision in the Court of Appeals again, so I'll have to make up for it here. Here's my analysis of the Sher opinion when it came out last year. I note with some degree of nostalgia the date of
Related Headlines
-
Louisiana Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on appeal of Landry case, interpretation of Valued Policy Law
posted 41 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 41 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A.M. Best podcast on Sher and Landry cases before Louisiana Supreme Court
posted 36 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 28 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog