In my post from Monday, I neglected to mention that in addition to Landry v. Citizens Property, the Valued Policy Law case, the Louisiana Supreme Court was also to hear oral arguments Tuesday for Sher v. Lafayette, a case where the lower appellate court found a flood exclusion in a homeowners policy ambiguous. I don't know why I did, I've known Sher was coming up for oral argument for some time, but we all do dumb things. Except Dickie Scruggs, that is, as his famous, rich friends like to point out. Forgetting to mention the case in the last post also means I missed a chance to rip into the decision in the Court of Appeals again, so I'll have to make up for it here. Here's my analysis of the Sher opinion when it came out last year. I note with some degree of nostalgia the date of
Read...Related Headlines
-
Louisiana Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on appeal of Landry case, interpretation of Valued Policy Law
posted 221 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 208 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealedposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealed
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog