I listened to it, not much time right now to comment. But here's the link. Listen for what he says about being influenced by Mike Moore and how the answers get pretty fuzzy when it comes to what Balducci and Patterson actually said to him. One thing though. Here he talks about getting word from his folks with the state grand jury that there was insufficient evidence of a crime to indict State Farm. Exactly when was that? And why then did he start up another grand jury investigation in July 2007?
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 191 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood discusses meeting with Balducci, Patterson
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Hood denies improprieties in State Farm investigationsposted 221 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood denies improprieties in State Farm investigations
posted 221 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 183 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 202 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog