I listened to it, not much time right now to comment. But here's the link. Listen for what he says about being influenced by Mike Moore and how the answers get pretty fuzzy when it comes to what Balducci and Patterson actually said to him. One thing though. Here he talks about getting word from his folks with the state grand jury that there was insufficient evidence of a crime to indict State Farm. Exactly when was that? And why then did he start up another grand jury investigation in July 2007?
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood discusses meeting with Balducci, Patterson
posted 26 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Hood denies improprieties in State Farm investigationsposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hood denies improprieties in State Farm investigations
posted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 11 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 46 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog