Zach Scruggs yesterday filed a motion seeking to dismiss the charges against him (here is a copy). If this were granted, it would be huge -- with Zach out of the case, much of the government's leverage over Dickie Scruggs would disappear, and chances of a plea agreement with the elder Scruggs would drop significantly. As is appropriate when a man is fighting for his liberty, Zach Scruggs pulls no punches. Here's the brief's lede (it was all one big paragraph in the brief, I've made it into three to make it a little easier to read):It has been clear since the filing of this indictment that the government has no credible evidence that Defendant David Zachary (“Zach”) Scruggs knowingly participated in any scheme to bribe a judge. That is precisely why what little
Read...Related Headlines
-
Scruggs Nation, February 12: the sweet potatoes edition
posted 223 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, March 6: anonymous jury, more sweet potatoes
posted 220 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Zach Scruggs' attorney files motion to withdraw
posted 228 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Sun Herald seeks Scruggs fan letters
posted 205 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 'When you ride alone you ride with Hitler'posted 249 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation: I Fought the Law and the Law Won version
posted 208 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog