Let's return for a moment to last week and the plea agreements of Dickie Scruggs and Sid Backstrom. We can surmise from the fact that Scruggs and Backstrom made plea agreements that Zach Scruggs also discussed a plea agreement.My working hypothesis was that one strong motivation for Dickie Scruggs to make a deal was to help get Zach out of this mess. This was based not just on common sense but information I received about family pressures Scruggs was receiving. Since then, I have also gotten quite a lot of information about what might have happened that led to no deal for Zach, and not all of this information is entirely consistent, or more accurately, it is consistent to a point but it is missing unanimity on the one key thing -- exactly why the deal fell apart. I believe that so
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 246 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears oral arguments in Tuepker v. State Farm Katrina caseposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation: I Fought the Law and the Law Won version
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 199 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog