I said I would be shocked if the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the lower court's finding that the standard flood exclusion was ambiguous. So I'm not shocked. Here's the decision. Again, not much time to blog right now, I'll have more to say about this case and Broussard when I can.
Read...Related Headlines
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealedposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealed
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog