This story in Fortune is outstanding, captures a lot of the excesses of the Scruggs litigation tactics. Lots of e-mails from readers this morning talking about it.
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears oral arguments in Tuepker v. State Farm Katrina caseposted 43 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida Supreme Court: Valued Policy Law requires payment only for covered portion of total lossposted 41 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 34 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Judge Senter rules against State Farm motion to disqualify Dickie Scruggs from Katrina casesposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on appeal of Landry case, interpretation of Valued Policy Law
posted 19 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 45 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Yet more anti-concurrent cause misunderstandingposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Mississippi AG Hood calls Dickie Scruggs a 'confidential informant," says he shouldn't be prosecutedposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog