I base a lot of my evaluation about how good a written product is on how long it takes me to read it. In this evaluation, time is relative -- I don't mind spending an hour reading something long, as long as I am able to progress from the front to the back without a lot of problems and unnecessary stops along the way to try to decipher the trail. By those standards, the Fifth Circuit's Broussard decision was good writing -- relatively short, easy to read, easy to understand, not filled with judicial pomposity and ego-mania. I didn't have time on Monday to post commentary about the case, but I did read it, and because I was pressed for time, I appreciated all those attributes of the opinion. Before we discuss the decision itself, here's another copy for you to follow along with. I th
Read...Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Colorado Court of Appeals: anti-concurrent cause provision bars coverage where covered snow combined with uncovereposted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 237 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog