I don't know that much about this case -- I only learned of it yesterday when the reporter called me -- but it has something to do with a pipe bursting under the slab of the house, I believe. In any event, the punitive damage award was a whopping $3.5 million. That's huge, considering the underlying breach of contract and emotional damages were only $84,000 and $50,000, and will likely be reduced somewhere along the way as exceeding the constitutional boundaries for punitive damages. Here's a blog post I saw on the story, where the commentary appears to be limited to which category the item was placed in.It's funny, every time I talk with a reporter, I wish I still was one, but that's about the only time that happens.
Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 45 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Jury awards homeowners $64,000 in Aiken v. USAA, bad faith issue not sent to jury, engineering firm was previouslyposted 23 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 12 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 12 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog