The McIntosh v. State Farm, easily the most contentious of the State Farm Katrina cases, has long been dark and bloody ground where lawyers clashed by night. This is the case where Kerri Rigsby herself approved the flood payment, then turned around and accused State Farm of overpaying flood damage with government money to minimize the company's liability for wind. It is also the case where those dumb engineer e-mails were so incessantly touted, it's one of the cases with two engineer reports, it's the case with the note in the file that said "put in wind file, do not pay bill, do not discuss." That last part deserves some comment: it was often erroneously rendered as "do not pay claim," which the note did not say. Instead, it seems obvious that it
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 34 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 39 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 34 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog