When Judge Senter issued his order disqualifying the Katrina(less) Litigation Group, was this letter from Don Barrett on behalf of the KLG what he had in mind? Where the Katrina Litigation Group handpicks a successor and sends clients a contract to sign up with that firm? Here's the key part of Judge Senter's order:The payments made to the Rigsby sisters require the disqualification of the successors to the SKG and those whom they have added as associates from further participation in any litigation in this Court against State Farm and Renfroe arising from property damage attributable to Hurricane Katrina.
Here's a link to the new firm Barrett recommends, including language welcoming the new Katrina clients. And here is a link to a story about the new firm being sued over attorne
Read...Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Does an application for flood insurance payments estop an insured from later claiming wind damage?posted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More misunderstandings of anti-concurrent cause languageposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears oral arguments in Tuepker v. State Farm Katrina caseposted 246 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog