Reading cases about insurance coverage for employee bad conduct is sometimes difficult -- not just the legal part of it, the facts are often pretty disturbing. I mean, some of these folks? We're talking major league weirdos. After I read some of these cases, I feel like going to wash my hands -- or not, considering they are often about some wacko using bathroom surveillance equipment. You read these, you've got to watch The Sound of Music three or four times just to get your mind right again.Randy Maniloff has done a service by taking a close look at some of these cases and how the coverage issues in them shake out. Here's a copy of a good article he wrote on the subject for a recent edition of Mealey's. Didn't ask him how many times he had to wash his hands during the course an
Related Headlines
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 45 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Landry v. Citizens Property: Louisiana Court of Appeals sows confusion, messes up causation analysis in Hurricane Rita cposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 34 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 12 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog