Posting will be light, probably, for the next few days due to extreme day job demands. I do want to mention, however, that I will be posting on Monday, April 28 the text of my new article on anti-concurrent cause and Fifth Circuit Katrina cases, being published this week in New Appleman on Insurance: Current Critical Issues in Insurance Law. In the course of examining the workings of anti-concurrent cause, this article puts a heavy emphasis on two things: a critique of the circuit court's decision in Leonard v. Nationwide and examination of the nature of ambiguity in insurance contracts. The second part was included for three reasons: it's fun to talk about, it was necessary to talk about, and it gives me an excuse to highlight once again the amazing work of Prof. Michelle Boardman
Related Headlines
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 48 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Appleman Critical Issues article, more anti-concurrent analysis and theory, exploration of the philosophical underposted 10 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 46 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 45 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 47 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 47 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 46 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Final version of Appleman's anti-concurrent cause/Katrina litigation articleposted 41 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Maniloff's Top 10 coverage cases of 2007
posted 28 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog