I was recently contacted by a stay at home mom who was, putting it politely, a little annoyed because she was told by an insurance agent that she could only be approved for 1/2 as much life insurance as her husband was carrying.
I explained to her that, in fact, that was the stance with the [...]
Read...Related Headlines
- More misunderstandings of anti-concurrent cause languageposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Landry v. Citizens Property: Louisiana Court of Appeals sows confusion, messes up causation analysis in Hurricane Rita cposted 246 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Appleman's anti-concurrent cause articleposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Final version of Appleman's anti-concurrent cause/Katrina litigation articleposted 244 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Colorado Court of Appeals: anti-concurrent cause provision bars coverage where covered snow combined with uncovereposted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 237 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 209 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog