I heard about the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Landry vs. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. yesterday morning, but had no time at all to do a post. Got too busy even to do an emergency post linking to the decision. But now I've read it, and I have a few moments to comment briefly. By the way, here is the Landry decision. Here is a link to a story by Rebecca Mowbray in the Times-Picayune.This decision is the first thing I've read in Landry that has made sense to me. The Court of Appeals' decision was more or less completely incomprehensible. The state Supreme Court went for the simplest analysis, which is always a good idea and keeps courts out of trouble, and that analysis is basically as follows: when the state's Valued Policy Law was re-enacted in 1991 aft
Related Headlines
-
Louisiana Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on appeal of Landry case, interpretation of Valued Policy Law
posted 26 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida Supreme Court: Valued Policy Law requires payment only for covered portion of total lossposted 49 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Landry v. Citizens Property: Louisiana Court of Appeals sows confusion, messes up causation analysis in Hurricane Rita cposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog