The latest filings in the McIntosh case's latest flare-up over discovery issues includes this interesting question posed in State Farm's brief in response to Dickie and Zach Scruggs' objections to Judge Walker's order compelling production of certain documents:Yet continuing their quest not to produce any documents, despite the substantial reduction in their scope, the Scruggses have filed another objection with this Court, thus causing one to wonder: What information could possibly be contained in those documents that the Scruggses so desperately want to keep from ever seeing the light of day?
The briefing for discovery fights in cases involving Scruggs and the former Scruggs Katrina Group provides some of the best details available as to Scruggs' methods of conducting litigation.
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 200 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog