In reading Judge Acker's opinion of yesterday once again, it is striking how different this writing is from most judicial and legal writing -- one can actually understand it, and it is well-written and enjoyable to read. I say "enjoyable" not merely because I agree with what it says, but because the judge made good use of the writer's storytelling tools. One other thing: Judge Acker is perhaps the only person who knows all the facts that are known about the Rigsby sisters' illicit taking of State Farm claims documents. He has seen the documents themselves -- they are under lock and key under a protective order in his courthouse under the injunction he issued in December 2006. And I do not see in this opinion or his prior opinions any hint that these documents ar
Related Headlines
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 12 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Dickie Scruggs asks that criminal contempt charges be droppedposted 47 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah: AG Hood calls Judge Acker 'unprofessional,' continues 2008 Self-Destruction Tour
posted 11 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, Day 22: the Renfroe v. Rigsby disqualification motion
posted 36 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog