Judge Senter's opinion is here. The Provost Umphrey firm in Texas, which had been recommended to policyholders by the disqualified Katrina(less) Litigation(less) Group, will not itself be disqualified, providing that within 14 days they can say the following is true:1. There is and will be no agreement between Provost Umphrey and any of the disqualified attorneys for a division of fees or any other arrangement of any kind for the payment of compensation to any of the disqualified attorneys for work performed after the date of my order of disqualification; 2. Neither Barrett nor any of the disqualified attorneys will participate, directly or indirectly, with Provost Umphrey in the future representation of these former clients; and 3. There is and will be no financial arrangement or u
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog