Employment law has developed into a gold mine for a few lucky people and their attorneys, resulting in increasing claims against employers and making employment practices liability insurance a mandatory coverage. One of the claims employers face is retaliation, and employers may be surprised to find that retaliation may be prohibited in certain cases. An article by law firm Troutman Sanders is an excellent review of retaliation exposure that employers may face (see here). The article talks about a crusading...
Read...Related Headlines
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More misunderstandings of anti-concurrent cause languageposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Yet more anti-concurrent cause misunderstandingposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 200 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Judge Senter rules against State Farm motion to disqualify Dickie Scruggs from Katrina casesposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog