I saw this opinion, California v. Allstate, a couple days ago but other things interfered with blogging about it until now. This is a case about coverage for environmental pollution under the "sudden and unexpected" language found in old liability policies, and that is an interesting thing in itself, but what chiefly interested me about this case was the extended discussion of the Partridge case, an influential case that, in days gone by, was in part responsible for the creation of the modern anti-concurrent cause language found in first party policies.
Partridge is not a first party case, of course, but its reasoning resonated beyond the third party liability context, as I discussed in this Appleman's Critical Issues article on anti-concurrent causation analysis fr
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Abracadabra: anti-concurrent cause and the search for 'illusory' insurance coverage
posted 168 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Coverage by admissionposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
First party property causation, New England style
posted 219 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Is anti-concurrent cause language 'unethical'?posted 243 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog