The "whistleblower" Rigsby sisters were rebuffed today in their appeal of a December 2006 preliminary injunction by federal district court Judge William Acker, who had ordered them to return thousands of pages of claims files they took from a E.A. Renfroe, a State Farm contractor. The U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Acker's injunction in an opinion that, as these things go, was bluntly worded in places. Most judicial opinions are not blunt and judges are usually quite gentle in saying why they prefer one argument over another -- however, they do not like their time to be wasted. So when judges openly label an argument "illogical," as happened in this opinion, they really didn't think much of it at all. Read a pdf of the opinion, and
Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 62 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Dickie Scruggs asks that criminal contempt charges be droppedposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Judge Senter rules against State Farm motion to disqualify Dickie Scruggs from Katrina casesposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 18 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 61 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 62 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 60 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 34 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 62 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog