Oral argument for the Leonard v. Nationwide was held Monday. Here's an Associated Press story about it. The Leonards, represented by Dickie Scruggs, on July 23 dropped their appeal of Judge Senter's decision, which held that the Leonards were not entitled to reform the policy based on alleged misrepresentations about hurricane coverage by the insurer and the Leonards' insurance agent. But Nationwide continued to press its appeal of another portion of Judge Senter's ruling -- that the anti-concurrent cause language in the Nationwide policy was ambiguous. Here's how the story reported Nationwide's argument: On Monday, Nationwide attorney Chris Landau asked a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit to overturn that portion of Senter's ruling [regarding the anti-concurrent cause language], w
Read...Related Headlines
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 237 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog