I like journalistic rants as much as the next guy: when I was a reporter I lived by the motto "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable." So I really wanted to like this Bloomberg News story, I really did. But I don't. If I didn't know anything about the matters written about in the story, or if I was willing to overlook certain gaps in logic, or if I was the kind of person who believes insurance companies sacrifice daily to Satan, I guess this story would really do it for me. But since none of those things are true, it doesn't. I'm not saying that insurance companies don't make dumb decisions. Nor am I defending any of the companies named in the story -- I am not an insurance company spokesman. But there's a whole lot of stuff mixed together in this story t
Related Headlines
- Southern California wildfires and insurance claimsposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Southern Califorina wildfires and insurance claimsposted 44 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Rare occurrence: good legal news for Scruggs
posted 2 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog