I like journalistic rants as much as the next guy: when I was a reporter I lived by the motto "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable." So I really wanted to like this Bloomberg News story, I really did. But I don't. If I didn't know anything about the matters written about in the story, or if I was willing to overlook certain gaps in logic, or if I was the kind of person who believes insurance companies sacrifice daily to Satan, I guess this story would really do it for me. But since none of those things are true, it doesn't. I'm not saying that insurance companies don't make dumb decisions. Nor am I defending any of the companies named in the story -- I am not an insurance company spokesman. But there's a whole lot of stuff mixed together in this story t
Read...Related Headlines
- Southern California wildfires and insurance claimsposted 224 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Southern Califorina wildfires and insurance claimsposted 224 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
California Court of Appeals: no guaranteed replacement cost means homeowner is solely responsible for adequate insposted 196 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
California Insurance Commissioner wants court decision depublished that placed responsibility on homeowner to obtaposted 191 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 183 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog