The folks at the University of Virginia Law Review sent me a link a few weeks back to this short article on Hurricane Katrina insurance issues by Kenneth Abraham, a law professor at Virginia. I think highly of Prof. Abraham's work, and cited his writing on mandatory rules, default rules and the role of standard form contracts in my upcoming anti-concurrent cause article in Appleman's. (And yes, it is indeed coming shortly, I got the final proof from the printer yesterday and have made the last corrections, it should be all done shortly and up on this blog). This Abraham article contains an interesting assertion about actions that were taken by courts and public officials to create an incentive for insurers "to settle Katrina claims rather than to force the courts to confront head
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Article on Fifth Circuit Katrina litigation for Appleman Critical Issues/chapter in Appleman treatise
posted 33 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- George Dale: insurance companies paid Katrina money they did not oweposted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Final version of Appleman's anti-concurrent cause/Katrina litigation articleposted 49 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog