Insurers have been successful in their Katrina appeals to the Fifth Circuit, and given the appellate court's analysis in two big cases -- Leonard v. Nationwide and In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation -- I would flat out drop my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette in amazement if the result were any different in State Farm's interlocutory appeal of Tuepker v. State Farm, even though none of the three-judge panel in this case was on the panel for either of the other two cases. I read the briefs again, and I have a very hard time seeing it go the Tuepkers' way. Here is their brief -- as you may know, Dickie Scruggs is their attorney. Here is State Farm's brief. The Tuepker brief deals a lot with their supposed reasonable expectations that they would be covered
Read...Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on appeal of Landry case, interpretation of Valued Policy Law
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealedposted 220 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Sher v. Lafayette ruling to be appealed
posted 220 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Landry Valued Policy Law: Louisiana Supreme Court rules for Citizens Property
posted 194 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog