A federal jury in Mississippi found on Friday that Katrina damage to the home of a Bay St. Louis couple was entirely caused by wind that destroyed the home before hurricane storm surge arrived. The insurer in this case was USAA, which said the damage was caused primarily by storm flooding and which had paid the couple, Kevin and Sherrye Webster, about $11,000 for wind damage plus about $42,000 for their barn. The jury's decision apparently was only on what caused the damage to the house, and the case settled after the jury went home for the weekend. According to one of the lawyers for the Websters, they will collect at least $800,000 from USAA. Here's a story on the case by Mike Kunzelman of the Association Press.
Read...Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Does an application for flood insurance payments estop an insured from later claiming wind damage?posted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Kodrin Katrina case: Fifth Circuit vacates punitive damage award against State Farm, upholds verdict of wind damagposted 167 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 241 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog