I've had requests for an update on United States of America v. Richard F. Scruggs -- the criminal contempt case against attorney Dickie Scruggs. The latest news is that last week Scruggs filed his response to an order requiring him to show cause why he should not be held in criminal contempt. More on this after this brief reminder of what we are talking about here. (Remember, the reason for the charges is that Scruggs allegedly violated an injunction by federal Judge William Acker requiring him to turn over documents to lawyers for E.A. Renfroe, a State Farm contractor. The documents were claims files taken from Renfroe by two employees, the so-called "whistleblower" Rigsby sisters, who while working for Renfroe secretly copied thousands of pages and gave them to Scrugg
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 161 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 158 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 159 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 118 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 162 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears oral arguments in Tuepker v. State Farm Katrina caseposted 157 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 109 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 129 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Mississippi AG Hood calls Dickie Scruggs a 'confidential informant," says he shouldn't be prosecutedposted 158 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog