I've had requests for an update on United States of America v. Richard F. Scruggs -- the criminal contempt case against attorney Dickie Scruggs. The latest news is that last week Scruggs filed his response to an order requiring him to show cause why he should not be held in criminal contempt. More on this after this brief reminder of what we are talking about here. (Remember, the reason for the charges is that Scruggs allegedly violated an injunction by federal Judge William Acker requiring him to turn over documents to lawyers for E.A. Renfroe, a State Farm contractor. The documents were claims files taken from Renfroe by two employees, the so-called "whistleblower" Rigsby sisters, who while working for Renfroe secretly copied thousands of pages and gave them to Scrugg
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 62 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 58 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears oral arguments in Tuepker v. State Farm Katrina caseposted 57 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 62 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 59 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Mississippi AG Hood calls Dickie Scruggs a 'confidential informant," says he shouldn't be prosecutedposted 58 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 18 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 49 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- State Farm, homeowners settle Katrina case in Mississippi state courtposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog