Dickie Scruggs, charged with criminal contempt of court for allegedly working with Mississippi AG Hood to circumvent a federal judge's injunction, has filed his reply to a special prosecutors' brief detailing Scruggs' supposed legal "sham."An excerpt from the Scruggs brief:Aside from being factually wrong, the "sham" theory fails as a matter of law because the Injunction's law-enforcement exemption requires nothing more than a request from law-enforcement officials. It does not require any inquiry into the state of mind of the requesting officials, or any inquiry into the process by which those officials decided to request the documents. Due process forbids reading additional restrictions and qualifications into the Injunction's law-enforcement exempti
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 200 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Hoodzpah, Part Deux: What will Hood say to these developments?
posted 206 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog