Dickie Scruggs, charged with criminal contempt of court for allegedly working with Mississippi AG Hood to circumvent a federal judge's injunction, has filed his reply to a special prosecutors' brief detailing Scruggs' supposed legal "sham."An excerpt from the Scruggs brief:Aside from being factually wrong, the "sham" theory fails as a matter of law because the Injunction's law-enforcement exemption requires nothing more than a request from law-enforcement officials. It does not require any inquiry into the state of mind of the requesting officials, or any inquiry into the process by which those officials decided to request the documents. Due process forbids reading additional restrictions and qualifications into the Injunction's law-enforcement exempti
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Dickie Scruggs asks that criminal contempt charges be droppedposted 47 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 12 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Prosecutors' court filing: Scruggs defied injunction for monetary gain, Hood helpedposted 45 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 22 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Rare occurrence: good legal news for Scruggs
posted 2 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog