-- This LA Times story about AIG's private fire crews that are brought in to protect enclaves of million-dollar-plus homes has an undertone of resentment. I saw a number of blog posts about this story, all ranging along the scale from upset to outraged. I posted about AIG's firefighters before these wildfires began, and as I indicated in that post, I'm curious what kind of lawsuits will eventually arise out of this practice. When it comes to insurance, eventually all angles of recovery will be tried. Even if does result in scattered litigation, however, it's worth it to AIG to avoid as many massive first-party claims as possible. Why do I think this will result in litigation at some point? As the outraged blog posts I saw indicated, this practice is particularly prone to be used in a
Read...Related Headlines
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 232 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 232 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 232 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 220 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 220 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Abracadabra: anti-concurrent cause and the search for 'illusory' insurance coverage
posted 153 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog