This post just happened to get lodged in my feedreader, and I just happened to read it. Nothing out of the ordinary, I've seen this argument in one form or another about -- hold on while I count -- I'd say about eleventy-billion times. The post takes issue with Allstate canceling policies in certain coastal counties of New York. Now, readers of this blog know that Allstate has a strategy of pulling back from what it believes was overextended risk in the homeowners insurance market. I'm not here to defend Allstate, but just talking in general, doesn't it seem like that argument is kind of tired? Do I say a restaurant owner should keep his restaurant open even though he is losing money merely because I like to eat there? What if he's a multi-millionaire many times over, should he lower
Read...Related Headlines
-
Return to blogging
posted 168 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
October 2007 anti-concurrent cause article
posted 216 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, June 5
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- The Unemployed are Dropping Health Insuranceposted 172 weeks ago on CrackInsurance
- Questions on Health Insurance and COBRAposted 166 weeks ago on CrackInsurance
- Those With Jobs Don?t Always Have Health Insuranceposted 154 weeks ago on CrackInsurance
- North Carolina Insurance Premiums For State Health Plan To Increaseposted 171 weeks ago on CrackInsurance
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog