This is old news, more or less, and many of you folks have been following this more closely than I have, but in case you didn't know, the Senate Banking Committee passed a flood insurance "reform" bill that stripped out the wind coverage provisions that were in the version that passed the House. The committee's issue with the wind coverage was the unknown cost, and I agree it is never wise to create a new program and hand it a blank check. That's like co-signing an auto loan for your brother-in-law, or asking some guy you meet on the street to watch your briefcase full of money while you finish text messaging the commissioner of your fantasy football league. I'd like to see, however, a side-by-side comparison of potential costs of the wind program and the cost of feder
Related Headlines
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 53 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs-backed candidate 'toasts' Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Daleposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Katrina round-upposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Federal wind coverage bill clears House committeeposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Maniloff's Top 10 coverage cases of 2007
posted 36 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog