This is old news, more or less, and many of you folks have been following this more closely than I have, but in case you didn't know, the Senate Banking Committee passed a flood insurance "reform" bill that stripped out the wind coverage provisions that were in the version that passed the House. The committee's issue with the wind coverage was the unknown cost, and I agree it is never wise to create a new program and hand it a blank check. That's like co-signing an auto loan for your brother-in-law, or asking some guy you meet on the street to watch your briefcase full of money while you finish text messaging the commissioner of your fantasy football league. I'd like to see, however, a side-by-side comparison of potential costs of the wind program and the cost of feder
Read...Related Headlines
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 233 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs-backed candidate 'toasts' Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Daleposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 233 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Katrina round-upposted 234 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 184 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 202 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog