In December 2004, Laci Peterson of Modesto, California disappeared from her home. Laci's husband, Scott Peterson, would later be convicted of killing her and her unborn son. The case turned out to be one of the most highly publicized cases in California history.
A panel of three judges in California recently ruled that Laci's mother is entitled to receive the death benefit proceeds from Laci's life insurance policy. Scott Peterson was named the primary beneficiary of the policy. However, he lost his rights to receive the death benefits because of his conviction.
Life insurance policies typically pay the death benefit proceeds according to the beneficiary structure of the policy. There are occasions where the benefits are not paid as directed by the policy. One example is if all beneficiari
Read...Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs-backed candidate 'toasts' Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Daleposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Florida insurance updateposted 249 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog