Last we heard from Forensic Analysis & Engineering Corp., a North Carolina outfit that did engineering reports on Katrina damage for State Farm, they were accusing Dickie Scruggs of violating a judicial order not to disseminate information on a computer hard drive Scruggs had obtained from a Forensic employee in July. Forensic got a federal judge to order that Scruggs keep the information, which Forensic said could include valuable proprietary information, to himself. However, two days later, the U.S. Attorney subpoenaed the hard drive in relation to on ongoing investigation -- Forensic was not amused by the timing, saying it did not appear to be a coincidence and that Scruggs may have tipped off the U.S. Attorney that he held the hard drive. (Click here to see a copy of the subp
Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 67 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Commentary on Fifth Circuit's decision in Tuepker v. State Farmposted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Forensic Analysis & Engineering firm settles with Scruggs, to be dismissed from RICO suit
posted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog