The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal came out with a case yesterday that I didn't learn of until about 8:42 p.m., and on this night I was safely home at that hour, but if I had been at work, I just may have been holding my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette, and had this been so, I surely would have dropped it in dumbfoundment when I came to pages 7 to 9 of this case. The name of this case is Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co., et al., and it is a case in which the trial court granted partial summary judgment for the policyholder, saying the insurer's flood exclusion was ambiguous. The appellate court agreed. Now, I am quite familiar with arguments positing a dichotomy between natural and man-influenced physical forces, and I am quite familiar with arguments tha
Related Headlines
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 20 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 40 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 27 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 56 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Colorado Court of Appeals: anti-concurrent cause provision bars coverage where covered snow combined with uncovereposted 3 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 52 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog