In yet another of the increasingly bizarre twists and turns in Katrina-spawned litigation, in USA v. Scruggs, the prosecution of Dickie Scruggs for criminal contempt of court, Scruggs filed a motion asking all federal judges in the Northern District of Alabama to recuse themselves, and they did. Click here to read the motion, which is short. Click here to read the order of recusal, which is shorter.Scruggs, in an extraordinarly deferential and respectful pleading, argued that the impartiality of the judge -- Judge L. Scott Coogler presided over the case -- or any judge in the Northern District was subject to question by an objective observer because a colleague, Judge William Acker, is the one who began the criminal case against Scruggs. Here's an excerpt:The extent of intimacy at
Read...Related Headlines
- USA v. Scruggs: entire Northern District of Alabama recuses itself from caseposted 236 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, Day 20: the wire
posted 231 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Rigsby sisters' D.C. attorneys withdraw from Renfroe case, cite lack of ability to pay
posted 218 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Rare occurrence: good legal news for Scruggs
posted 197 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs-backed candidate 'toasts' Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Daleposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog