In yet another of the increasingly bizarre twists and turns in Katrina-spawned litigation, in USA v. Scruggs, the prosecution of Dickie Scruggs for criminal contempt of court, Scruggs filed a motion asking all federal judges in the Northern District of Alabama to recuse themselves, and they did. Click here to read the motion, which is short. Click here to read the order of recusal, which is shorter.Scruggs, in an extraordinarly deferential and respectful pleading, argued that the impartiality of the judge -- Judge L. Scott Coogler presided over the case -- or any judge in the Northern District was subject to question by an objective observer because a colleague, Judge William Acker, is the one who began the criminal case against Scruggs. Here's an excerpt:The extent of intimacy at
Related Headlines
- USA v. Scruggs: entire Northern District of Alabama recuses itself from caseposted 55 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, Day 20: the wire
posted 50 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 67 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 68 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Potpourri Thursdayposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A couple Fifth Circuit Katrina cases from earlier this weekposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs-backed candidate 'toasts' Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Daleposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Biden gives back Scruggs money: does this mean he will be the Veep nominee?
posted 15 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, February 12: the sweet potatoes edition
posted 42 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog