This San Diego Union-Tribune story from 2005 explores that question. In light of the recent California wildfires, it is worth a look back to see what resulted from the supposedly large numbers of people who were underinsured in the 2003 wildfires:More than 96 percent of Scripps Ranch fire victims are building bigger houses, and 69 percent are getting houses at least 500 square feet larger than before, according to a San Diego Union-Tribune analysis of city records. New homes now stand shoulder-to-shoulder on the lots, with less room in between for privacy. In a neighborhood where 60 percent of fire victims said in one survey that they were underinsured, how did they do it?
Read the whole thing, as they say.By the way, here are some stats from the State of California on insurance com
Read...Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Yet more anti-concurrent cause misunderstandingposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More misunderstandings of anti-concurrent cause languageposted 245 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Anti-concurrent cause language articleposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Abracadabra: anti-concurrent cause and the search for 'illusory' insurance coverage
posted 168 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Colorado Court of Appeals: anti-concurrent cause provision bars coverage where covered snow combined with uncovereposted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- A last word this week on In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog