A recent New York Appellate Court decision provides a measure of the potential severity of liability costs associated with a failure to follow privacy laws, and the need for insurance coverage for breach of privacy. What is interesting about this case is that it does not involve technology. A simple phone call to the wrong person was the cause of the breach (we don't consider a phone call technology these days). The case, Randi A.J. v. Long Is. Surgi-Center (here...
Read...Related Headlines
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Comment on a couple Katrina casesposted 244 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 250 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguous
posted 235 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher case
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Reaction to Sher cases
posted 215 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog