Yesterday in the Scruggs criminal case in Mississippi, the government filed its response to a December 28 defense motion to compel the government to provide certain evidence in discovery. That defense motion can be seen by clicking here, and we will get back to talking about it shortly.Here is a copy of the government's response. Now, taking these documents together, a couple things emerge.On November 27, the day the FBI raided the Scruggs Law Firm, Steve Patterson was placed into custody. The defense motion requests "[A]ny recording of the November 27, 2007 telephone conversation between Balducci and Patterson that occurred while Patterson was in custody, or any written record containing the substance of this conversation." So Balducci, presumably cooperating wi
Read...Related Headlines
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- 11th Circuit affirms Judge Acker's preliminary injunction in Renfroe v. Rigsby "whistleblower" caseposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 200 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 247 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Judge Acker hammers Scruggs, Rigsby sisters for contempt
posted 207 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Scruggs Nation, Day 18
posted 232 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog