I haven't seen so many lawyers move around this fast since they evacuated my building last year because of a gas leak. Seems like everyone in the Scruggs case either wants someone else's lawyer or the lawyer wants someone else's client. Sounds like a writer's-strike Boston Legal script that didn't make the cut. Why, next thing you know, Dickie Scruggs is going to say he wants to swap judges . . . oh wait, that's no joke, he's already tried that twice, once in his criminal contempt of court prosecution in Alabama (successful) and once in the Renfroe v. Rigsby case in Alabama (unsuccessful so far). With this much mind-changing, I don't want to get behind these guys in line for ice cream. By the way, if you've got catching up to do, here's a link to my post Monday on the Langston f
Related Headlines
- Fifth Circuit hears arguments in Leonard v. Nationwide Katrina appealposted 69 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- California U.S. District Court says Katrina storm surge is not excluded by excess policy's flood exclusionposted 67 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Initial impressions on Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigationposted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- More on Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutualposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 17 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 70 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Nationwide v. Leonard: Fifth Circuit upholds anti-concurrent cause provision as unambiguousposted 66 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 37 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Biden gives back Scruggs money: does this mean he will be the Veep nominee?
posted 15 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Louisiana Fourth Circuit finds flood exclusion ambiguousposted 54 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog