Lots of interest from readers in this story from the Daily Journal with hints as to what may be going on with Steve Patterson. Here's a copy of the documents the story mentions as being filed today -- Defendants' Reply to the government's response to the defendants' earlier motion to compel discovery, and the accompanying Exhibit A. The point of the story is that Patterson is not listed as among the defendants making the reply, whereas he was listed as being behind the actual motion made late last month. True enough. Lots of rumors about what is going on, some of it you take with a grain of salt, some of it you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. Incidentally, someone also pointed out to me that, although Tony Farese continues to be Zach Scruggs' attorney, F
Read...Related Headlines
-
Patterson-, Balducci-related letters making the rounds in Mississippi
posted 233 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Scruggs contempt roundupposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation: More on Fifth Circuit's decision, did the Court hint how it will go on Tuepker?posted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
A great new blog
posted 217 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Bloomberg story on insurance company bad faithposted 251 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Around the insurance world todayposted 249 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Mississippi Bar seeks to disbar Scruggses
posted 200 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
Stars in stripes: Dickie Scruggs reports to prison
posted 198 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
-
U.S. Supreme Court rejects cert. for In Re Katrina Canal Breaches case
posted 222 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog
- Washington Supreme Court: dentist's 'boar'-ish behavior is coveredposted 248 weeks ago on Insurance Coverage Blog